Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Half of Republicans say increased racial diversity will be “mostly negative”

Most Americans — and Democrats in particular — disagree.

President Donald Trump holds a rally in Montana.
President Donald Trump holds a rally in Montana.
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

A plurality of Republicans don’t feel good about increased racial diversity.

A recent survey from the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) and the Atlantic asked Americans how they feel about the possibility, based on US Census data, that in the next few decades black, Latinx, Asian, and other minority groups will together surpass white Americans as the demographic majority. Sixty-four percent of Americans, including 85 percent of Democrats, said this will have “mostly positive” results. But half of Republicans said it will produce “mostly negative” outcomes.

The survey, which in June polled more than 1,000 people nationwide as well as hundreds of people in five states, is not the first to produce this kind of finding — with previous research suggesting that racial anxiety and outright racism are major animators for Republicans and, specifically, supporters of President Donald Trump.

One study, conducted by researchers Brenda Major, Alison Blodorn, and Gregory Major Blascovich shortly before the election, found that if people who strongly identified as white were told that nonwhite groups would outnumber white people by 2042, they became more likely to support Trump.

A separate study, published last year by Brian Schaffner, Matthew MacWilliams, and Tatishe Nteta, found that voters’ measures of sexism and racism correlated much more closely with support for Trump than economic dissatisfaction after controlling for factors like partisanship and political ideology.

So what’s going on here? Some of this might be outright racism — a concern that white people are losing a country that they believe should belong to them. There are also concerns, as Jane Coaston wrote for Vox, about “white genocide,” the idea that white people are being slowly, systematically wiped out by demographic changes.

Arlie Hochschild, a sociologist and author of Strangers in Their Own Land, provided an apt analogy for how many white Republicans feel: As they see it, they’re all in a line toward a hill with prosperity at the top. But over the past few years, globalization and income stagnation have caused the line to stop moving. And from their perspective, other groups — black and brown Americans, women — are now cutting in the line because they’re getting new (and more equal) opportunities through anti-discrimination laws, policies like affirmative action, and immigration.

There also may be some political self-preservation at play: Minority groups tend to vote Democrat more than Republican, so the growth of these minority groups could hurt GOP electoral opportunities — and Republicans, unsurprisingly, don’t want that.

Trump has cashed in on these concerns. When he reportedly said that he doesn’t want people coming in from “shithole countries” like Haiti and African nations, but did want people from “countries like Norway,” he was signaling that the US could use more people from white-dominated countries versus majority-nonwhite nations. It’s one of the issues he’s referring to when he makes comments about how “if you don’t have a border, you don’t have a country” — raising concerns that letting in people from predominantly nonwhite countries could essentially wipe out America as we know it.

Based on PRRI and the Atlantic’s survey, not every Republican shares this sentiment, with 43 percent saying that increased racial diversity will have “mostly positive” results. For at least a plurality of Republicans, though, increased racial diversity is a problem.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters