Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump just warned the shutdown could last for years. That’s pretty unlikely.

Some Republicans are already pushing to reopen the government.

President Trump Speaks In The Rose Garden Of White House After Meeting With Congressional Leaders On Gov’t Shutdown
President Trump Speaks In The Rose Garden Of White House After Meeting With Congressional Leaders On Gov’t Shutdown
President Donald Trump
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Li Zhou
Li Zhou is a former politics reporter at Vox, where she covers Congress and elections. Previously, she was a tech policy reporter at Politico and an editorial fellow at the Atlantic.

President Donald Trump warned on Friday that the partial government shutdown could last not just for “months,” but “years” — a prospect that’s incredibly unlikely.

Months? Maybe. Years? Probably not.

Following a meeting with congressional leaders including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Trump emphasized that he stood as firm as ever in his request for border wall money — and said he wouldn’t be willing to reopen the government until lawmakers allocated the funds he wants.

Up until now, Trump has argued that he won’t settle for anything less than $5 billion in border wall funding, while Democrats have drawn the line at $1.3 billion for border security.

If Congress doesn’t acquiesce to his demands, a stalemate could go for “years,” Trump said during the meeting, according to Schumer. Trump later confirmed the remarks to reporters and added that while he saw a standoff like that as a possibility, he personally hoped it “doesn’t go on even beyond a few more days.”

Trump’s own caveat points to just how unlikely such a lengthy shutdown would be.

It’s true that he isn’t the first to note that it could go on for some time — Senate Appropriations Chair Richard Shelby (R-AL) posited that it could extend for “months” earlier this week — but the idea that it would last for “years” is a major stretch.

For one, it would mark a completely unprecedented lapse in government functionality: The longest government shutdown that’s ever taken place in US history lasted for 21 days, meaning none have gone on for more than a month, let alone a year. For this shutdown to break this record by such an extent would be pretty shocking.

What’s more, Congress almost definitely wouldn’t let that happen — especially given the hundreds of thousands of federal employees whose paychecks are directly affected by the impasse. As things stand, roughly 800,000 federal employees are either furloughed or working without pay, and they’ll be seeing that dent in their paychecks shortly on January 11. (These employees have typically received back pay after previous shutdowns have ended, though many government contractors have not.)

The outcry from federal employees — some of whom have had to file for unemployment or take up other work to cover costs — is already putting pressure on lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to find a resolution, and if it goes on for much longer that’s expected to only increase.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters on Friday that staffers are negotiating this weekend. “The Leader said [Friday] that staff would be working over the weekend with the aim of having solutions by early next week,” a spokesperson from his office reiterated. McConnell’s statement comes as a growing number of House and Senate Republicans, including Cory Gardner (R-CO), are urging leadership to reopen the government and do so without providing wall funding.

Of course, it’s possible that Trump continues to maintain his opposition to any deal that emerges. In that scenario — if the shutdown drags on for long enough — Republicans and Democrats could theoretically join together to override a Trump veto, which requires two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate.

Either way, it’s more likely they’ll figure a way out than let this shutdown continue for anywhere close to a year.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters