Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Infants and pregnant women will soon pay the price for Trump’s wall shutdown

Federal funding for breastfeeding support and infant formula is at risk if the government shutdown drags on.

Christine Ford uses her WIC coupons to purchase produce at the Ward 8 Farmers Market Cooperative in DC in 2012.
Christine Ford uses her WIC coupons to purchase produce at the Ward 8 Farmers Market Cooperative in DC in 2012.
Christine Ford uses her WIC coupons to purchase produce at the Ward 8 Farmers Market Cooperative in DC in 2012.
The Washington Post/Getty Images
Dylan Scott
Dylan Scott covers health for Vox, guiding readers through the emerging opportunities and challenges in improving our health. He has reported on health policy for more than 10 years, writing for Governing magazine, Talking Points Memo, and STAT before joining Vox in 2017.

So far, the federal program that provides food assistance and other support for women, infants, and children — known as WIC — has not been affected by the ongoing government shutdown. At least not yet.

But if the shutdown drags on much longer, benefits for some families could be reduced or cut off entirely, depending on how long the impasse lasts.

WIC covers about 8 million new mothers, infants, and children under 5 years old, at the cost of $6 billion a year. The majority of the program’s dollars pay for food assistance, but WIC also spends millions on breastfeeding support and infant formula.

There is enough funding available already out to the state and local departments that administer the program to provide WIC benefits through at least mid-February, advocates told me.

But after that, things could start to get dicey. Experts expect benefits would start to be reduced in the latter half of February, or March at the latest, depending on how much funding states can make available to stretch out. Benefits could start to be cut in a number of ways: WIC programs could start issuing benefits for just one month, instead of the usual three, or they might cut or end benefits for new mothers and older children, in order to prioritize the pregnant mothers and infants who rely on the program.

“By the end of March, we’ve reached a cliff,” says Rev. Douglas A. Greenaway, president and CEO of the National WIC Association. “The longer this goes on, the more uncertainty it creates ... the more dire the circumstances become.”

The USDA — the federal department that oversees WIC and the much larger food stamps program called SNAP — is one of several government agencies currently lacking federal funding until a new spending plan gets passed by Congress and signed by President Donald Trump.

The USDA has said it is working with states to identify unspent and other funds that could be redirected to prevent a reduction in benefits.

“March of Dimes is very concerned that the shutdown will endanger WIC benefits if it persists longer than a couple more weeks,” Cindy Pellegrini at the advocacy organization says.

WIC and SNAP are both federal food assistance programs at risk of benefit cuts, but they are operated separately.

Center for Budget and Policy Priorities

Benefits for the larger SNAP program, which covers nearly 40 million people who rely on it for food security, could also start to be reduced in February if the shutdown lingers into next month, as Vox’s Tara Golshan already reported:

Come February, the Department of Agriculture, among the nine federal agencies that shut down in December, is warning that it may have to severely cut the nation’s largest food aid program, known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) — commonly referred to as food stamps, the Washington Post reported.

Congress has appropriated funding for SNAP through January, according to the USDA. After that, the department has to tap into a $3 billion emergency fund, which won’t be able to cover even two-thirds of the program in February. In September 2018 — the most recent month with data available — states disbursed $4.7 billion in food aid through SNAP, which serves more than 38 million people.

In other words, unless the government reopens before the end of January, millions of Americans living below the poverty line could be left in the lurch and their access to food threatened by February. The USDA did not respond for comment.

But program advocates fear the effects are already being felt if beneficiaries or retailers are confused by the WIC’s status under the shutdown. Greenaway from the National WIC Association gave the example of a mom who goes to a supermarket to buy formula but is told by a mistaken cashier that she can’t use her WIC benefits to pay for it.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters