Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

CNN reports that Rudy Giuliani’s financial dealings are under investigation by prosecutors

It’s in connection with a probe of his two associates, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman.

Rudy Giuliani
Rudy Giuliani
Rudy Giuliani
Angela Weiss/AFP/Getty Images
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

Rudy Giuliani — President Trump’s lawyer and a central figure in the impeachment inquiry threatening the president — is also under scrutiny in a federal investigation of two of his associates, CNN’s Evan Perez, Shimon Prokupecz, and Michael Warren reported Thursday.

According to the CNN team, prosecutors in the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York “are examining Giuliani’s involvement in the broader flow of money” involving Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman. Parnas and Fruman were arrested on charges of violating campaign finance law Wednesday as they tried to leave the country on one-way tickets.

The news means that, just as President Trump faces political jeopardy from the sprawling Ukraine scandal and House Democrats’ impeachment probe, the president’s personal lawyer — who is at the center of that scandal — is facing legal jeopardy himself.

For months, Parnas and Fruman have worked closely with Giuliani on his effort to get the Ukrainian government to investigate President Trump’s political opponents. The two — who were both born in the Soviet Union but are now US citizens and have been involved in various questionable business ventures — opened doors for Giuliani in Ukraine over the past year. They connected Giuliani with key officials who claimed to have information that could help Trump politically.

So it was a major story when news of Parnas and Fruman’s arrests broke Thursday morning. The indictment focuses on alleged false statements and disclosures made by Parnas and Fruman regarding hundreds of thousands of dollars they donated to Republican groups and candidates in 2018.

The indictment did not mention Giuliani at all, even obliquely, making it unclear whether his conduct was in fact a focus of SDNY’s investigation. But it’s certainly no surprise to learn that he is in fact under scrutiny because there’s long been a mystery about what, exactly, was going on among this trio.

Particularly, it’s been unclear who was paying Giuliani to gallivant around the world in search of dirt that would help Trump. Giuliani has said that Trump does not pay him. He has also referred to Parnas and Fruman as his “clients,” but he has never confirmed whether he was being paid by them. The indictment also alleges that Parnas and Fruman funneled money in from foreign sources to influence US politics and were directly involved in the effort to force out the US Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch. (Giuliani also took a keen interest in ousting Yovanovitch this year.)

Parnas and Fruman’s lawyer John Dowd didn’t exactly clear the matter up in a letter to Congress this week. He claimed that the pair “assisted Mr. Giuliani in connection with his representation of President Trump” and added that they also have “been represented by Mr. Giuliani in connection with their personal and business affairs.”

So it would certainly make sense if prosecutors have some questions about what, exactly, was going on with this (in CNN’s words) “flow of money.” And it suggests that SDNY’s investigation could indeed be problematic for Giuliani himself.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters