Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Oklahoma is releasing 462 inmates in the largest single-day commutation in US history

The state’s Republican leaders are forging ahead with criminal justice reform.

The entrance sign and guard tower at Oklahoma State Penitentiary.
The entrance sign and guard tower at Oklahoma State Penitentiary.
The entrance sign and guard tower at Oklahoma State Penitentiary.
Shepard Sherbell/Corbis via Getty Images

Oklahoma will release more than 460 prison inmates on Monday in what will amount to the largest single-day mass commutation of sentences in US history.

The move, pushed by Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt and the Republican-controlled legislature, is part of the state’s efforts to reform its criminal justice system. On Friday, Stitt signed off on the commutation of 527 inmates’ sentences, with 462 to be released on Monday and 65 later, Holly Yan reported for CNN.

The inmates were all convicted of nonviolent offenses.

Oklahoma has claimed the highest incarceration rate in the US, which itself has the highest incarceration rate of any country in the world.

In recent years, both Democrats and Republicans have pushed to lessen incarceration. Some of that is in reaction to research finding that higher incarceration rates — and longer prison sentences in particular — don’t actually reduce crime or improve public safety. The system is rife with racial disparities, as minority Americans are much more likely to be locked up. And incarcerating so many people is expensive.

“Had these inmates served their full uncommuted sentence, it could have cost the State of Oklahoma approximately $11.9M for continued incarceration based upon the average costs,” the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board said in a statement.

The US prison population has steadily declined since 2010. The drop has occurred across the political spectrum, from liberal states like California to more moderate ones like Virginia to conservative states like Texas. Pew Charitable Trusts noted that declines in state prison populations often occurred alongside declines in crime — indicating that higher incarceration rates aren’t needed to maintain public safety gains.

President Donald Trump ran on a “tough on crime,” pro-incarceration platform, eventually nominating hardliners like Jeff Sessions and William Barr, who in the 1990s signed off on a report titled The Case for More Incarceration, to head the US Department of Justice. But as president, Trump also signed into law the First Step Act, the biggest criminal justice reform law in decades, after veto-proof bipartisan majorities in Congress approved the measure.

Still, the federal system actually makes up a small piece of the overall prison population in the US — with nearly 88 percent of people in US prisons held in state facilities. That’s why moves like Oklahoma’s are so important: To really undo mass incarceration, the states will have to act.

It’s mostly up to states to undo mass incarceration

Consider the statistics: In the US, federal prisons house about 12 percent of the overall prison population. That is, to be sure, a significant number in such a big system. But it’s relatively small in the grand scheme of things, as this chart from the Prison Policy Initiative shows:

One way to think about this is what would happen if Trump used his pardon powers to their maximum potential — meaning he pardoned every single person in federal prison right now. That would push down America’s overall incarcerated population from about 2.1 million to about 1.9 million.

That would be a hefty reduction. But it wouldn’t undo mass incarceration, as the US would still lead all but one country in locking people up: With an incarceration rate of around 600 per 100,000 people, only the small country of El Salvador would come ahead.

Similarly, almost all police work is done at the local and state level. There are about 18,000 law enforcement agencies in America — only a dozen or so of which are federal agencies.

So it will largely be up to the states to pull back incarceration. Crucially, if the goal is to get down to the incarceration rates of other developed democracies, reform will at some point need to reduce sentences for violent crimes as well, because most people in state prisons are in for violent offenses.

Oklahoma, at least, has focused on nonviolent offenses. In 2016, voters in the state approved ballot measures reducing some property and drug offenses from felonies to misdemeanors, and allocating the savings to rehabilitation programs. The governor and legislature have built on those reforms — culminating on Monday with the largest single-day commutation in US history.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters