Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Prosecutor: Roger Stone lied because “the truth looked bad for Donald Trump”

Stone’s trial began with the prosecution’s fiery opening statement.

Roger Stone, wearing dark shades and a grey suit, steps out of a car.
Roger Stone, wearing dark shades and a grey suit, steps out of a car.
Roger Stone, former advisor to President Trump, arrives for the second day of his trial at the E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse in Washington, DC on November 6, 2019.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

Roger Stone’s trial kicked off in earnest Wednesday with a fiery opening statement from prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky, and the statement was peppered with references to Donald Trump.

“In a critical investigation of national importance, the defendant, Roger Stone, repeatedly lied under oath to a congressional committee and lied under oath to cover up his tracks,” Zelinsky said.

“The evidence will show that Roger Stone lied to the House Intelligence Committee because the truth looked bad,” Zelinsky continued. “The truth looked bad for the Trump campaign and the truth looked bad for Donald Trump.”

Stone advised Trump on politics on and off for about three decades, and after a brief stint on Trump’s official presidential campaign in 2015, he began supporting Trump from the outside instead.

Stone was indicted by special counsel Robert Mueller on seven total counts of obstruction, false statements, and witness tampering related to his alleged attempts to mislead the House Intelligence Committee about his communications involving WikiLeaks and hacked Democratic emails in 2016. Mueller has since left his post, and the prosecution is being handled by the US attorney’s office for Washington, DC. Stone has pleaded not guilty.

Zelinsky confirmed that former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon — who was the Trump campaign’s CEO — will be called to testify at the trial. “You’re gonna hear from Steve Bannon,” the prosecutor told the jury.

He also revealed new evidence that was not previously known, related to Stone’s contacts with the Trump campaign. Specifically, he said:

  • On June 14, 2016, after the Democratic National Committee announced they had been hacked by the Russian government, Roger Stone called Trump.
  • On July 31, 2016, a few days after Stone had told his associate Jerome Corsi to “get to [WikiLeaks founder Julian] Assange” and get ahold of “emails” WikiLeaks had, Stone called Trump again. About an hour after the call, Stone emailed Corsi again, to say a friend of theirs in London should see Assange.
  • On August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone about what he said were Assange’s plans, and mentioned “Podesta” — a reference to John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair whose emails were also hacked. The next day, Stone emailed Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort, saying that he had an idea “to save Trump’s ass.”
  • On August 18, 2016, shortly after Bannon had been named CEO of the Trump campaign, Stone emailed Bannon, saying that he knew how to win this election, but “it ain’t pretty.”

Zelinsky admitted that he does not know what Trump and Stone discussed on the phone. Still, the calls were not previously known — and they reveal that Stone was still in touch with Trump personally around the time Stone professed to have knowledge of WikiLeaks’s plans to release emails damaging to the Clinton campaign.

Much of this information is likely in the Mueller report, but redacted, to avoid prejudicing Stone’s trial. Now, we’re finally learning what’s under some of those black bars.

The defense will give an opening statement Wednesday afternoon. Read my fuller explainer on Stone’s trial for more.

See More:

More in Politics

Politics
Mifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for nowMifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for now
Politics

Only Thomas and Alito publicly dissented.

By Ian Millhiser
Podcasts
Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in TrumpWhy the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
Podcast
Podcasts

Trump helped overturn Roe. Anti-abortion advocates still aren’t happy.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious rightA year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
Politics

Americans don’t really want “Christian nationalism.”

By Christian Paz
Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating