Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Judge says she may impose gag order on Roger Stone

Judge Amy Berman Jackson said she was considering limiting Stone from speaking publicly about the case.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

Since his indictment by special counsel Robert Mueller last week, Roger Stone has been omnipresent in the media, proclaiming his innocence and decrying the circumstances of his arrest.

But he may not have much longer to do so. Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who will oversee Stone’s case in US District Court, suggested she was considering imposing a gag order — which would limit Stone’s ability to speak publicly about the case outside of court.

Jackson made the statements at her first status conference for the Stone case Friday afternoon. She remarked that the case had already amassed a great deal of public attention, “fueled in large part by extrajudicial statements of the defendant himself.” But, she said, “this is a criminal proceeding, not a public relations campaign.”

She said she respected Stone’s First Amendment rights to free speech — but said he had also decided to exercise his right to a fair trial, that it’s her responsibility to make that happen, and that treating pretrial publicity “like a book tour” could impede that by making it harder to seat an impartial jury.

Jackson stressed that any such order would apply to all parties in the case, not just Stone. (She imposed a similar order after Paul Manafort was indicted in Washington, DC, in late 2017.) She also said the order would only apply to public statements “that could have prejudicial impact on this case” — and said Stone would remain free to opine publicly on other topics, from foreign relations to “Tom Brady.”

The judge said she would offer both sides the opportunity to offer their views on such an order in writing, before makes up her mind. Those filings are due on Friday of next week.

Mueller has indicted Stone on seven counts of obstruction of justice, making false statements, and witness tampering. The charges allege that Stone attempted to obstruct congressional investigations into Russian interference with the 2016 election. Mueller says Stone did this by withholding evidence, lying, and by pressuring a witness not to testify about potential links between Stone and WikiLeaks.

Stone has insisted in television and radio interviews, as well as on his Instagram feed, that he is innocent and being “framed” by Mueller.


For more on the Mueller probe, follow Andrew Prokop on Twitter and check out Vox’s guide to the Trump-Russia investigation.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters