Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The House Ways and Means Committee wants Trump’s tax returns by April 23

The original deadline was April 10.

House Ways and Means ranking member Richard Neal (left) (D-MA) confers with Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) during a press conference where congressional Democrats reacted to the Republican tax reform proposal on November 1, 2017, in Washington, DC.
House Ways and Means ranking member Richard Neal (left) (D-MA) confers with Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) during a press conference where congressional Democrats reacted to the Republican tax reform proposal on November 1, 2017, in Washington, DC.
House Ways and Means ranking member Richard Neal (left) (D-MA) confers with Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) during a press conference where congressional Democrats reacted to the Republican tax reform proposal on November 1, 2017, in Washington, DC.
Win McNamee/Getty Images

Rep. Richard E. Neal (D-MA), the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, set April 23 as the deadline for the Trump administration to submit six years of the president’s tax returns to the committee in a letter sent to Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Charles Rettig Saturday.

Neal originally asked for the returns to be submitted by April 10; that deadline was not met, with Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin citing concerns over “the unprecedented nature of this request.”

In his new letter to Rettig, Neal argues the concerns raised by Mnuchin about Congress’s investigative authority “lack merit,” and as he did in his first request, the Ways and Means Committee chair cited a law from the 1920s he says authorizes the committee to request the any taxpayer’s tax returns.

“To date, the IRS has failed to provide the requested return and return information despite an unambiguous obligation to do so under section 6103(f),” Neal wrote. “I expect a response from the IRS by 5 p.m. on April 23, 2019. Please know that, if you fail to comply, your failure will be interpreted as a denial of my request.”

In his April 10 letter, Mnuchin told Neal he planned to consult with the Department of Justice about Congress’ authority in requesting tax returns. Neal said this coordination was improper.

“It is not the proper function of the IRS, Treasury, or Justice to question or second guess the motivations of the committee or its reasonable determinations regarding its need for the requested tax returns and return information,” Neal wrote.

While Democrats continue to build a legal case to obtain the tax returns, lawyers for President Donald Trump are making the case that the request for his financial records threatens to politicize the IRS.

Last week, William Consovoy sent a letter to Treasury arguing that releasing Trump’s tax returns was a violation of privacy, according to Vox’s Emily Stewart.

“Even if Ways and Means had a legitimate committee purpose for requesting the President’s tax returns and information, that purpose is not driving Chairman Neal’s request,” Consovoy wrote. “His request is a transparent effort by one political party to harass an official from the other party because they dislike his politics and his speech.”

What happens if the April 23 deadline is missed?

Should the Trump administration fail to supply the Ways and Means Committee with the returns by the new deadline, Neal will be left with a few options, including issuing subpoenas or working to settle the matter in court.

Vox’s Sean Illing spoke with 11 legal scholars about what might happen should the Treasury Department refuse to turn over the returns.

Philip Hackney, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh, said Neal has done a good job of covering his legal bases so far, and said the chair “might consider holding the commissioner of the IRS and perhaps the secretary of the Treasury in contempt of Congress” if Mnuchin refuses to cooperate.

From there, “the committee might then file a declaratory judgment asking the DC District Court to hold those officers in contempt and provide an injunction ordering them to comply with the law,” Hackney said. It would be up that court to decide whether or not to grant that request.

This option could be one Neal is open to exploring; he told CNN recently his committee had been careful in the manner in which in requested Trump’s tax returns to “make sure that the case we constructed was one that stood up under the critical scrutiny of the courts.”

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters