Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A federal judge temporarily blocks Mississippi’s “heartbeat” abortion law

The legal fight begins.

Protestors hold signs, one of which reads, “Abortion is health care.”
Protestors hold signs, one of which reads, “Abortion is health care.”
People hold signs during a protest against recently passed abortion ban bills.
Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images

A federal judge has temporarily blocked Mississippi’s law banning abortions at as early as six weeks — after the detection of a heartbeat — marking the beginning of what will almost certainly be a drawn-out battle in the courts.

“Allowing the law to take effect would force the clinic to stop providing most abortion care,” US District Judge Carlton Reeves wrote in the temporary injunction he issued Friday afternoon. “By banning abortions after the detection of a fetal heartbeat, the law prevents a woman’s free choice, which is central to personal dignity and autonomy.”

Conservative state lawmakers across the country have been passing aggressive anti-abortion bills in hope of undermining Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that protects a woman’s right to an abortion. Similar “heartbeat bills” have been passed in Georgia, Ohio, Iowa, and Kentucky, though none have yet taken effect.

The Mississippi law, now blocked by the courts, was set to take effect in July. The Center for Reproductive Rights representing Mississippi’s only abortion clinic — the Jackson Women’s Health Organization — challenged the law, arguing that because it takes effect before most women know they’re pregnant, it effectively constituted an unconstitutional ban on abortions.

But as Anna North and Catherine Kim have reported for Vox, the rise of heartbeat bills this year shows just how much the abortion debate has escalated in the United States. “A few years ago, such bans were considered too extreme even by some anti-abortion groups,” North and Kim write.

Sponsors of anti-abortion laws across the country have been explicit about their strategy: They’re looking for a legal fight to get in front of the Supreme Court, whose makeup is in conservatives’ favor. Since President Donald Trump’s election, the bills have become more and more extreme; Alabama earlier this month enacted a near-total ban on abortion in the state, with no exceptions for cases of rape or incest.

Even Reeves, having blocked the state’s 15-week abortion ban in November, made clear he has been here before.

The first words in his order blocking the latest law: “Here we go again.”

Go deeper

  • Vox’s Anna North explains the heartbeat bills that seek to ban abortion as early as six weeks, like the Mississippi law currently blocked in the courts.
  • Republicans want to get the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade. But as North reports, there’s a possibility this strategy of stoking legal fights by passing extreme anti-abortion legislation might actually backfire.
  • That said, Roe is still very much in danger. The landmark decision has survived for decades because of luck, Scott Lemieux writes for Vox. But that could be about to change.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters