Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump claims California officials admitted he was “right” about wildfires. That didn’t happen.

Trump took a victory lap for a claim that was easily debunked and widely mocked.

President Trump Speaks At Renewable Energy Company In Iowa
President Trump Speaks At Renewable Energy Company In Iowa
Trump speaks on Tuesday in Iowa.
Scott Olson/Getty Images

President Donald Trump brought up on Tuesday the deadly wildfires that ravaged California last year and said, “we are finally starting to see some progress on better forest management,” during a speech in Iowa that was purportedly about renewable energy.

“Remember I went to California [last November], I saw something that nobody has ever seen — it was like a blowtorch,” Trump continued. “It was 80 mile an hour winds, and the death and destruction was incredible, and I said, ‘you need forest management.’ They were saying it was global warming. It could have had something to do with it, but you need forest management.”

Trump was doubling down on a flimsy talking point he first advanced last fall amid the historically devastating wildfires about poor forest management being responsible for wildfires. Not only that, but during his speech in Iowa, he went on to take a victory lap over California officials eventually admitting he was right all along.

There’s just one problem — that never happened.

Trump’s wildfire talking point, briefly debunked

As unscientific as it is, Trump’s talking point was useful for him on two fronts, as it allowed him to attack a blue state in which he’s unpopular while downplaying the impacts of climate change.

But Trump’s claim was swiftly and definitively debunked by fact-checkers and scientists who explained that not only has climate change has created conditions in California in which wildfires thrive, but also that a large portion of the affected area wasn’t a forest. To cite one notable example, University of New Mexico biology professor Matthew Hurteau wrote for a piece the Guardian explaining why Trump is wrong to minimize the role of climate change:

The severity of these fires is moderated by rain and snowfall. California’s Mediterranean climate means that the state receives heavy precipitation for only a few short months in the winter, and this is all that the vegetation has to tide it over until the winter storms begin the next year. As the temperature increases in spring and summer and plants use up the water stored in the soil, the amount of water held in plants decreases, making them more flammable. Similar to fire wood, the drier it is, the easier it burns.

Climate change is causing warmer temperatures, which dry out vegetation more. It is also causing winter precipitation to fall over a shorter period and the length of the fire season is increasing. Vegetation in California is increasingly primed for fire.

Trump, however, is not only pretending that he was right all along, but now he’s going even further and falsely claiming California officials were enlightened by and acted upon his unscientific analysis of the fires.

“You can’t let 15 and 20 years of leaves and broken trees and dead wood that after the first 18 months is dry as a bone — you can’t let that be there,” he said on Tuesday in Iowa. “You have to clean it, you have to clean those floors of the forest, and you’re gonna see a big difference.”

Trump went on to try and turn the tables on people who mocked him for his forest management comments (emphasis mine):

And actually, they mocked me. They said, “Oh what’s he doing, he’s talking about sweeping the floors.” Well, I don’t use the word “sweeping,” but you have to have forest management. And all of the sudden about four weeks after that happened they learned I was right. And now they are managing the forest at least as much as they could. They have a long way to go, because there’s a lot of it. But when you look, every year, year after year, you see California mostly burning down — it’s management. And I think they’re going to do a much better job.

Watch:

It is true that informed people have legitimate concerns about forest management in California, including the clearing of dead trees from forests. But even experts who take those concerns seriously criticized Trump for trying to pin most of the blame for wildfires on management while ignoring the most significant underlying causes.

It’s not as though California policymakers had been ignoring forest management before Trump weighed in. As NBC reported last December, then-California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) responded to a string of wildfires in 2017 by signing a series of bills “that will streamline regulations for thinning forests in fire zones, allow limited removal of some larger trees and force cities and counties to plan better defenses for individual properties and communities.” In other words, California officials were already doing what Trump demanded they do before he demanded it.

Trump has also congratulated himself this week over an immigration agreement with Mexico that mostly consists of vague assurances from the Mexican government to do things they had already committed to do. As this illustrates, Trump puts a premium on creating the perception of scoring wins, even if reality isn’t all that he cracks it up to be. Toward that end, in the case of wildfires, Trump is willing to go to the extent of putting words in the mouths of California officials.


The news moves fast. To stay updated, follow Aaron Rupar on Twitter, and read more of Vox’s policy and politics coverage.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters