Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Now that Netflix has more streaming competitors, it suddenly cares about ratings

Netflix used to say that Nielsen numbers were useless. Now that’s changing.

The cast of Netflix’s “Queer Eye” each holding an inflatable letter, spelling out “Yaaas.”
The cast of Netflix’s “Queer Eye” each holding an inflatable letter, spelling out “Yaaas.”
The cast of Netflix’s Queer Eye.
Austin Hargrave/Netflix
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Netflix, which is best known for streaming TV shows, likes to position itself as the anti-TV service: No ads, no schedule, no waiting a week to watch new episodes.

And, also, no ratings: If you want to know how popular a Netflix show is, you are probably going to be out of luck.

For years, Netflix didn’t provide any viewing data about its programming at all and kept this information close to the chest. The only way to tell, more or less, if a show was doing well on Netflix was to see if Netflix renewed the show.

In the last year or so, that has started to change. The company is publicly providing some viewing numbers for select shows and movies Netflix wants to brag about; it is also sharing limited numbers with some outsiders that make shows for Netflix.

But as Netflix faces a slew of new streaming competitors — Apple launched last week, Disney is launching next week, and more are coming — now Netflix says that ratings may not be a terrible idea, after all.

On Tuesday at the New York Times DealBook conference, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings said that subscriber numbers — the primary metric Wall Street has used to evaluate his company for years — wouldn’t be that useful to judge new competitors as they come online because so many of them will be giving away their programming, or bundling it with other offers, to drive up their subscriber numbers.

In order to get a better sense of how Netflix and its competitors stack up, he said, you should look at numbers from ... Nielsen, the TV ratings service that has recently started providing data about Netflix programming:

Time, that’s the real competition. The tricky thing in this streaming war, Apple and Disney aren’t going to break out revenue for the service.

You’ll hear some subscriber numbers but you can just bundle things in so that’s not going to be that relevant. So the real measurement will be time — how do consumers vote with their evenings? And do they end up watching what mix of all the services?

Starting in Q1, you’ll start to see a breakout of that, from Nielsen and others.

That’s not a full endorsement of Nielsen’s Netflix estimates, which the company gathers on its own without official help from Netflix. But it’s also a change in the way Hastings and his company have previously discussed Nielsen’s work: Previously, Netflix said Nielsen doesn’t have enough insight into its 160 million subscribers to put together accurate viewing data.

Here are several caveats:

  • Right now, Nielsen only provides streaming estimates for Netflix and Amazon; the company won’t say whether it intends to do the same for the likes of Apple+ and Disney+ so we don’t know whether Nielsen will actually provide the breakouts Hastings was predicting.
  • Whatever ratings numbers Nielsen does provide are almost certainly likely to show Netflix in a good light, at least to start, since the company has a huge lead on its competitors: Disney and Apple will be starting from zero subscribers while Netflix has around 160 million worldwide.
  • Netflix will presumably continue to cherry-pick numbers it tracks on its own for certain shows and movies that perform particularly well and publicize those. It’s unlikely to share numbers on shows that don’t have impressive numbers.

Hastings’s suggestion that investors, analysts, and other outsiders think about how much time streaming customers spend with Netflix isn’t new. The company has long put out aggregate streaming numbers — either to make the argument that Netflix customers spend a lot of time with Netflix or to point out that they could eventually spend much more time with Netflix.

They did the latter earlier this year when they argued that Netflix accounted for 10 percent of TV screen time with the suggestion that the company’s hold on your entertainment attention span could grow much bigger over time.

Still, it’s striking to see Netflix embrace Nielsen numbers in any way, most notably because Nielsen ratings exist to support a business model Netflix doesn’t use at all: Nielsen numbers are important to traditional TV networks because those networks use the numbers to sell ads. But Netflix sells ad-free subscriptions so it has never needed to convince advertisers to buy space on Stranger Things or The Irishman; it just needs subscribers to think those shows — or anything on Netflix — are worth paying for.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh