Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Amazon wants to pay the New York Times and BuzzFeed to expand so it can reach more shoppers outside the US

Big US publishers already make money from Amazon’s “affiliate” business. Amazon wants them to make more, and may pay them upfront.

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos.
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos.
Jeff Bezos’s Amazon may pay US publishers to expand their international presence.
Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images for WIRED25
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Amazon has a pitch for some US-based publishers: Expand overseas. We’ll make it worth your while.

The world’s dominant e-commerce player is in talks with big American publishers, including the New York Times and BuzzFeed, about deals that would reward them for expanding their international presence, specifically in consumer-oriented shopping sites.

Amazon already pays internet publishers that refer shoppers to the company via “affiliate links” embedded on their site, but it thinks that business could grow significantly if US publishers had more readers outside of America.

Right now, publishers are paid when a shopper clicks on a link on their site, heads to Amazon, and eventually buys something. But sources say Amazon has been proposing various deals that would give publishers money up front in order to expand their international sites or open up new markets.

If any of the deals get finalized, they will mark a new chapter for Amazon: While other tech companies, including Facebook, Google, and Twitter, have paid publishers in advance to make specific kinds of videos or other content, Amazon hasn’t been in that business before.

It’s also an indicator that even though Amazon dominates online commerce, it still thinks it needs help getting shoppers inside its giant site. While Amazon is the place shoppers go to find something specific — it is increasingly challenging Google in the search results race as shoppers head directly to Amazon to look up a specific item — affiliate links can drive shoppers to stuff that Amazon is particularly interested in selling or that shoppers may not have known they could get from Amazon.

It’s unclear how much money Amazon is talking about — though it’s enough for several publishers to take seriously — and which markets the company is most interested in. Also unclear: Whether Amazon would be flat-out underwriting publishers’ expansions or if it would expect to get paid back via revenue the affiliate links generate.

Amazon is specifically interested in publishers that have built up significant affiliate link units and would be paying them to build out those groups. That includes BuzzFeed, which has made e-commerce a significant part of its revenue strategy and has hired a team of writers to create shopping-friendly content; the Times, which bought the Wirecutter shopping guide for around $30 million in 2016; and New York Media, which has turned New York Magazine’s “Strategist” shopping section into a meaningful part of its online business mix.

Reps from Amazon, BuzzFeed, the Times, and New York Media declined to comment.

Affiliate links aren’t a new idea (Vox Media sites also participate), but they’ve taken on additional importance for publishers that are struggling to compete against Facebook and Google for online ad revenue.

Here’s how they generally work: A publisher mentions or recommends a particular product and includes a link to Amazon or another shopping site where a consumer can go to buy it. If a shopper heads there directly from the publisher’s site, the shopping site will reward the publisher by giving it a percentage of the total “basket” of goods the shopper ends up buying.

Industry sources say those percentages vary depending on the publication, shopping site, and the kind of goods, but can average around 10 percent for publishers that generate real volume.

Publishers I’ve talked to about Amazon’s discussions say they’re not uncomfortable contemplating taking money from Jeff Bezos and company (again, it’s not a new idea for a tech company to steer some of its enormous resources to a media company). But they are aware that taking money from a giant tech company means you have to be aware that the tech company’s needs and strategy can change, which means they can’t expect Amazon to underwrite them forever.


Recode and Vox have joined forces to uncover and explain how our digital world is changing — and changing us. Subscribe to Recode podcasts to hear Kara Swisher and Peter Kafka lead the tough conversations the technology industry needs today.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh