Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Google employees are backing Warren. Facebookers are putting their money on Harris.

Here’s who employees at big tech companies are supporting in the Democratic presidential primary.

Chairs in an auditorium with Democratic presidential campaign signs on each seat.
Chairs in an auditorium with Democratic presidential campaign signs on each seat.
Democratic candidates spoke at the California Democrats 2019 State Convention in San Francisco this month and brought lots of signs.
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Rani Molla
Rani Molla was a senior correspondent at Vox and has been focusing her reporting on the future of work. She has covered business and technology for more than a decade — often in charts — including at Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal.

Employees at big tech companies are putting their money where their politics are. For the 2020 primary race, that means mostly dividing their political donations among the 20-plus Democratic presidential candidates.

Kamala Harris, with $68,000 in individual donations, was the top recipient of donations for presidential candidates this quarter from employees of Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, according to data from GovPredict, a political analytics platform. The California senator was followed by Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren — both of whom have been the most aggressive in criticizing tech company behavior and calling for their regulation. Trump also received a few thousand dollars, but Democrats were the main beneficiaries.

Political loyalties also differed by company, according to the data, which pulled from Federal Election Commission data on primary donations and only includes itemized donations (sums of less than $200 don’t require that a donator list their job).

Google employees gave the largest share of donations, $31,000, to Warren. Microsoft and Amazon employees favored Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, while Apple workers favored Sen. Cory Booker. Facebook gave the largest share of its money to Harris. Twitter, which is much smaller than these other companies but which we included because of its political importance, saw the biggest share of employee donations go to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand.

This data only includes campaigns that were announced prior to or during the first quarter of 2019, so Joe Biden, who announced his run in April, does not yet have available data. Biden’s campaign announced that it raised $6.3 million in donations of all kinds on its first day of fundraising, but those numbers won’t appear in FEC filings until the second quarter results.

Donations are expected to increase following Wednesday and Thursday’s debates, but this data gives an early glimpse at where tech employees might put their money. Individuals can donate up to $2,800 for the primaries. They can donate another $2,800 in the general election.

Tech employees don’t necessarily represent all individual Democratic donors in the US, who have put the largest share of their money toward Bernie Sanders, followed by John Delaney, Warren, Harris, and Gillibrand. And individual donations are just one funding source for candidates; they also get money from committees and PACs.

Still, these tech companies are some of the largest employers in the US and employees at these companies are responsible for many of the products — software and hardware alike — that Americans use every day. Their industry has also been the target of political scrutiny and potential regulation.

Typically, Silicon Valley tech employees skew much more liberal in their political donations than their employers, which, like most corporations, tend to be less partisan in their donations. Corporate money also generally tends to support incumbents, who are more likely to win and secure the company’s ties in Washington.

Here’s the data again all on one page:


Recode and Vox have joined forces to uncover and explain how our digital world is changing — and changing us. Subscribe to Recode podcasts to hear Kara Swisher and Peter Kafka lead the tough conversations the technology industry needs today.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh