Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Gillette owner Procter & Gamble is acquiring one of its razor startup competitors

Just like rival Unilever did with Dollar Shave Club.

Bevel

Procter & Gamble has acquired Walker & Company — creators of Bevel, a grooming line marketed to men of color, and Form, a hair care line marketed to women of color — Walker & Company founder Tristan Walker announced Wednesday morning.

Though the amount of the acquisition is undisclosed, Recode estimates it’s between $20 million and $40 million. Walker also said the company headquarters will move from Silicon Valley to Atlanta as a cost-saving measure, and to be closer to its largest customer base.

The interesting tension at the heart of the acquisition is the fact that Bevel’s raison d’être has always been contextualized in opposition to Procter & Gamble’s Gillette, which owns 54 percent of the global razor market; as Recode put it, Walker & Co. was “aiming to build the Procter & Gamble for people of color.”

Related

Founded in 2013 with $33 million of venture capital, Bevel was focused on single-blade razors, which it says cause less skin irritation for people of color, or anyone with curlier or thicker hair that can easily become ingrown as the result of a multi-blade approach. (Triple-blade or five-blade razors, which Gillette focuses on, are designed to pull facial hair up above the surface of the skin before cutting it, so when the hair snaps back down below the surface, a curly hair is more likely to spiral into the skin, instead of growing back out.)

In fact, when Vox spoke to Walker a few weeks ago for a feature on the absurdity of the razor industry — published just Tuesday morning! — he said, “None of our consumers can use [Gillette] products.”

Asked then about his plans for the coming year, and whether he feared drawing ire or legal threats from Gillette, in the manner that Dollar Shave Club or Harry’s did, Walker said, “We are well-positioned. I can’t really speak toward how excited or fearful Gillette is about the future, but I can’t personally use their products, nor can our customers.”

“I can’t really speak toward how excited or fearful Gillette is about the future, but I can’t personally use their products, nor can our customers”

As Recode’s Jason Del Rey points out, Walker & Company will benefit from Procter & Gamble’s massive research and development ($1.9 billion) and advertising ($7 billion) budgets, as well as its firmer positioning in global supply chains. This will be particularly important given the 25 percent tariff President Trump has placed on imported steel, which so far only razor makers Gillette and Schick have procured an exemption on.

From the other side, Procter & Gamble is swallowing a competitor (as it did by buying the Art of Shaving in 2009). It’s also getting a toe in the door with an underserved consumer base — as Walker said, his customers can’t use the company’s existing products.

More broadly, an acquisition like this is yet another sign that the conversation about how direct-to-consumer brands flush with cash from huge rounds of startup fundraising are changing the retail game forever is overblown. Procter & Gamble is acquiring Walker & Company after its DTC phase — the startup’s products have been in Target since September 2015 — and two years after its archrival Unilever acquired DTC pioneer Dollar Shave Club for $1 billion.

Harry’s, the grooming startup co-founded the same year as Bevel by Warby Parker’s Jeff Raider, went from DTC darling to more traditional industry giant (valued at $1 billion), buying up its own blade factories in Germany, opening a brick-and-mortar flagship, and securing retail deals with Walmart, Target, and Barneys.

“We have retail partners [like] Target,” Walker told Vox a few weeks ago. “That’s going to expand very soon. We want to make money with the products we sell, as opposed to relying on fundraising.” Cash, for sure, is not something they’ll have to worry about now.

See More:

More in Money

Future Perfect
We’re missing the economic fallout of the Iran war — just like we did with CovidWe’re missing the economic fallout of the Iran war — just like we did with Covid
Future Perfect

The cognitive trap that’s making us underestimate the Iran crisis.

By Bryan Walsh
Politics
The lucky few who can apply for tariff refundsThe lucky few who can apply for tariff refunds
Politics

The Trump administration launched its tariff refund portal. Will the refunds really happen?

By Andrew Prokop
Politics
An expert forecasts how the Iran war could hit your budgetAn expert forecasts how the Iran war could hit your budget
Politics

The Strait of Hormuz is reopening. But the war’s impacts on the food economy could linger.

By Eric Levitz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Future Perfect
The tax code rewards generosity. But probably not yours.The tax code rewards generosity. But probably not yours.
Future Perfect

Why giving to charity is a better deal if you’re rich.

By Sara Herschander
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser