Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Kama Sutra is not (just) about sex

How one of the world’s oldest books on erotic love is very misunderstood.

Ranjani Chakraborty was a lead video producer on the Vox video team and the creator behind Vox’s history series, Missing Chapter.

Across cultures and continents, the Kama Sutra has a long-held reputation as one of the earliest texts on the art of sex. It’s spawned an industry of merchandise since its popularization, from illustrated books to films, branded condoms, and magazine columns. But there’s a problem: The book isn’t that sexy.

Published in the West in the late 1800s by British explorer and “orientalist” Richard Francis Burton, the Kama Sutra brought exotic notions of Indian sex to a restrained Victorian society. While people tended to focus on the chapters involving sex positions, the bit that deals with physical acts of intimacy is just one section of this seven-part treatise. When looked at in its entirety, the 2,000-year-old book tells a different story.

Originally compiled by philosopher Vatsyayana, the Kama Sutra was written as an intricate guide to setting up a life of luxury and leisure in ancient India. And when you read it, you’ll find advice on how a man can successfully commit adultery, how he should set up a bachelor pad, how women sex workers can make money, how to keep a woman faithful by using milkweed thorns, what types of women are “not to be enjoyed” — and verses describing when forcible marriage is appropriate.

In reality, it’s less of a sex manual and more of a deep look at ancient Indian power structures, gender roles, and the etiquette of pleasure. To learn more about what the Kama Sutra really says, watch the video above. And for more videos, subscribe to Vox’s YouTube channel.

See More:

More in Video

Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
America, Actually
The progressive plan to reclaim the working classThe progressive plan to reclaim the working class
Podcast
America, Actually

Progressive caucus chair Rep. Greg Casar on his movement’s new playbook.

By Astead Herndon
Video
The Department of Holy WarThe Department of Holy War
Play
Video

What Pete Hegseth’s fascination with the Crusades can tell us about the war in Iran.

By Nate Krieger
Video
Live Nation lost. Will anything change for ticket prices?Live Nation lost. Will anything change for ticket prices?
Play
Video

A jury ruled Live Nation and Ticketmaster a monopoly, but what that means for ticket prices is not so simple.

By Frank Posillico
Eating the Ocean
Why are states unleashing millions of these fish?Why are states unleashing millions of these fish?
Play
Eating the Ocean

America’s fishing paradox.

By Nate Krieger
Video
Why Americans can’t escape credit card debtWhy Americans can’t escape credit card debt
Play
Video

Credit card APRs are now as high as 20 percent.

By Frank Posillico