Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

What’s left of affirmative action, explained

A discrimination case against Harvard puts affirmative action in the spotlight again — but the debate often paints an inaccurate picture of the policies.

The latest attack on affirmative action comes in the form of a lawsuit that alleges Harvard is discriminating against Asian Americans. The highly charged allegation follows a long history of conservatives casting Asians as victims of affirmative action in hopes of outlawing the policy.

But the affirmative action debate often paints an inaccurate picture of what affirmative action actually is.

Originally, it was a policy that gave people of color a boost in the admissions process as a way to undo the effects of historical discrimination.

But over the past several decades, the Supreme Court has incrementally narrowed how colleges can consider race in admissions. The Court has ruled that colleges can’t consider race to as a way to undo the effects of historical discrimination. Instead, schools can only use it to create a diverse student body.

The Supreme Court has also ruled that schools can’t have a race-based quota, where a certain number of seats are designated to applicants of color. And schools can’t just give a boost to all students of a certain race. Rather, they must consider each student holistically — and only consider race as one factor.

It’s left colleges with a tiny, vague pathway to consider race with the goal of diversity. And now conservatives are hoping this Harvard case will make it to the Supreme Court — which now has a conservative majority — and that the Court will kill affirmative action altogether.

Further confusing this debate is the question of where Asians fit into affirmative action. In this Harvard case, affirmative action opponents have tried to entangle the alleged discrimination Asians might face in the admissions process with the systemic discrimination that has kept black and Hispanic students from achieving similar success in the American education system.

Watch the video above to find out what we get wrong about the affirmative action, and how Asians might fit into the debate. For more videos, subscribe to Vox’s YouTube channel.

More in Video

Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
America, Actually
The progressive plan to reclaim the working classThe progressive plan to reclaim the working class
Podcast
America, Actually

Progressive caucus chair Rep. Greg Casar on his movement’s new playbook.

By Astead Herndon
Video
The Department of Holy WarThe Department of Holy War
Play
Video

What Pete Hegseth’s fascination with the Crusades can tell us about the war in Iran.

By Nate Krieger
Video
Live Nation lost. Will anything change for ticket prices?Live Nation lost. Will anything change for ticket prices?
Play
Video

A jury ruled Live Nation and Ticketmaster a monopoly, but what that means for ticket prices is not so simple.

By Frank Posillico
Eating the Ocean
Why are states unleashing millions of these fish?Why are states unleashing millions of these fish?
Play
Eating the Ocean

America’s fishing paradox.

By Nate Krieger
Video
Why Americans can’t escape credit card debtWhy Americans can’t escape credit card debt
Play
Video

Credit card APRs are now as high as 20 percent.

By Frank Posillico