Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump’s UN ambassador broke the law — by retweeting Trump

A law from 1939 applies to Twitter.

US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley broke the law — by retweeting President Donald Trump.

That’s according to the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), which today concluded that Haley violated the Hatch Act, which restricts federal officials (excluding the president and vice president) from engaging in certain political activities to ensure federal resources aren’t used for solely political means.

Here’s what happened: On June 19, Trump took to Twitter to endorse Ralph Norman, a Republican running for Congress in South Carolina, the state where Haley was governor until she joined the president’s Cabinet this year.

Now, under the Hatch Act, the president is allowed to do that sort of thing. Haley, on the other hand, is not. So when she retweeted Trump’s tweet endorsing Norman, people who track these sorts of ethical violations noticed.

Haley quickly deleted the offending tweet, but it was too late. An ethics watchdog group, the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, had already seen it and subsequently filed an official complaint.

And on Tuesday the OSC agreed that Haley broke the law:

OSC has concluded that Ambassador Haley violated the Hatch Act when she retweeted President Trump’s June 19 message about Ralph Norman on an account that repeatedly invoked her official position as Ambassador to the United Nations.

However, because Haley didn’t continue to engage in political activity on Twitter, she will not receive an official punishment. Instead, she received a warning letter and training on how to avoid such violations again in the future.

This is unlikely to hurt Haley

There is a bit of irony that it is Haley — and not Trump — who gets an official rebuke for using Twitter inappropriately.

However, what’s more important is that Haley is among the frontrunners to take over as secretary of state should Trump fire Rex Tillerson. Haley would go through a confirmation hearing in the Senate, and a senator may bring up this issue.

That said, it’s unlikely this episode would derail Haley’s political ambitions — including running for president someday. And if something like this retweet happens again, law enforcement would consider it “a willful and knowing violation of the law,” which could get her into more trouble down the line.

But for now, Haley gets to keep her job — and her Twitter account.

Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
Podcasts
Did Trump actually help Venezuela?Did Trump actually help Venezuela?
Podcast
Podcasts

Post-Maduro, some Venezuelans are feeling cautiously optimistic.

By Ariana Aspuru and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
5 ways the Iran standoff could end5 ways the Iran standoff could end
Politics

Is the US on the verge of a deal with Iran or a return to war?

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Ukraine’s fight against Russia is going better than you might thinkUkraine’s fight against Russia is going better than you might think
Politics

The war in Iran looked like a gift for Russia. It hasn’t worked out that way.

By Joshua Keating
The Logoff
Why Trump says the US-Iran war is overWhy Trump says the US-Iran war is over
The Logoff

Trump’s plan to evade an Iran deadline, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters