Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

RT, Russia’s English-language propaganda outlet, will register as a “foreign agent”

They’re complying with a World War II era-law that was passed to fight Nazi propaganda.

Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Russia’s state-owned media outlet, RT, has announced that it will comply with US government demands to register as a “foreign agent” of the Russian government, amid controversy over Russia’s attempts to influence the 2016 presidential election.

It’s a move that effectively marks the network, which runs both a website and a cable television channel, as a propaganda outfit for Moscow.

“The American Justice Department has left us with no choice,’’ Margarita Simonyan, RT’s editor-in-chief, said in a statement on Thursday. “Our lawyers say that if we don’t register as a foreign agent, the director of our company in America could be arrested, and the accounts of the company could be seized.’’

RT, which began as Russia Today in 2005, is headquartered in Moscow, with English-language studios in Washington, DC, and Europe. Its critics in the US have long argued that its critical and conspiratorial coverage of the American government is motivated by the Kremlin’s geopolitical interests.

Russian officials are furious about the development, and Russian President Vladimir Putin promised last month to reciprocate by placing restrictions on American media outlets in Russia. A senior lawmaker in Russia said on Friday that legislators plan to change regulations on foreign media in order to do so.

RT’s coverage aggressively pushes a pro-Kremlin viewpoint

US intelligence agencies and Russia experts have long argued that RT’s coverage of American politics and current affairs appear to be driven by Moscow’s political agenda. In January, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence published a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election that identified RT as a primary source of propaganda in the US that was intended to advance Russian interests.

As my colleague Zack Beauchamp explains, the ODNI report found that RT began aggressively producing pro-Trump and anti-Hillary Clinton content starting in March 2016, which was the same time the Russian hacking campaign targeting Democrats began.

And according to the report, top staff at RT’s foreign bureaus are closely linked to the Kremlin.

Robert Orttung, a professor at George Washington University who studies Russian media, told the Hill in September that Russian media operations “are trying to undermine democracy” in the US, and that the Russian government is “using the openness of our system to work against [our democratic system].”

RT, for its part, disputes the accusation that it’s a mouthpiece for the Kremlin, and instead considers itself to be a news operation that provides an alternative take on global events. “Where relevant, RT does present a Russian perspective on current events, but we don’t promote the Russian point of view, we explain it alongside with presenting others,” RT’s deputy editor-in-chief Kirill Karnovich-Valua told the New York Times in October.

RT can still function — but it will be monitored more closely

RT will be registering as a foreign agent under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, a World War II-era law that sought to identify and counteract pro-Nazi propaganda. Today it mainly serves as a way of tracking and unmasking foreign influence in the US.

Experts say RT’s new legal status shouldn’t directly interfere with its ability to broadcast its work, but the outlet will now be tightly monitored by the Department of Justice. As the Hill reports, foreign agents have to file biannual reports to the US government that disclose any funding and communication from a foreign client (in this case, the Russian government) meant to influence US policy.

RT will also have to indicate that their content is either bankrolled by the Russian government or expresses its views. It’s unclear how exactly they will convey that, but China Daily, a Chinese state-run media operation that’s registered as a foreign agent in the US, does it with an explanation on its Facebook and About Us pages, the Hill notes.

The RT news comes amid a broader reckoning with Russian influence in the American political process. Twitter and Facebook have recently taken heat for failing to vet Russian government-backed advertising during the 2016 elections. And the FBI and Congress are investigating whether Trump or any of his associates coordinated with the Russian government in a bid to tip the results of the elections.

Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
Podcasts
Did Trump actually help Venezuela?Did Trump actually help Venezuela?
Podcast
Podcasts

Post-Maduro, some Venezuelans are feeling cautiously optimistic.

By Ariana Aspuru and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
5 ways the Iran standoff could end5 ways the Iran standoff could end
Politics

Is the US on the verge of a deal with Iran or a return to war?

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Ukraine’s fight against Russia is going better than you might thinkUkraine’s fight against Russia is going better than you might think
Politics

The war in Iran looked like a gift for Russia. It hasn’t worked out that way.

By Joshua Keating
The Logoff
Why Trump says the US-Iran war is overWhy Trump says the US-Iran war is over
The Logoff

Trump’s plan to evade an Iran deadline, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters