Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump just committed to NATO’s Article 5. Finally.

“I’m committing the United States — and have committed — but I’m committing the United States to Article 5.”

President Trump Holds News Conference With President Of Romania Klaus Iohannis
President Trump Holds News Conference With President Of Romania Klaus Iohannis
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

President Donald Trump stunned both his own aides and the leaders of America’s closest allies in late May when he departed from his prepared remarks and cut a sentence explicitly saying he was committed to the mutual defense provision at the heart of the NATO military alliance.

On Friday he went off-script again — but this time to casually say that he was, in fact, committed to Article 5 of the NATO charter. That completed a stunning transformation for Trump, who began his campaign for the presidency by trashing NATO as obsolete only to now say he sees it as a capable military partner and would come to the defense of any member nation attacked by Russia.

“I’m committing the United States — and have committed — but I’m committing the United States to Article 5,” Trump said in a press conference alongside visiting Romanian president, Klaus Iohannis.

NATO allies — and Trump’s own staff — would be forgiven for feeling a sense of whiplash after Trump’s changes of mind on the alliance’s relevance over the past two years.

Still, they are surely glad the president of the United States has come around to fully endorse NATO’s main reason for being.

Trump’s NATO evolution is complete

During the campaign, Trump called NATO “obsolete.” He later reversed his opinion in office, wrongly claiming the alliance was now willing to fight terrorism because of Trump’s demands it do so (NATO has actually been officially committed to battling terrorism since the 1980s, and has deployed troops to Afghanistan since the US-led war there began in 2001).

He has also bashed allies for not spending enough on defense, saying they need to contribute to the alliance’s 2 percent spending benchmark. Some countries are already starting to do that. Trump is taking credit for the spending uptick, but it was in the works way before he became president.

But if Trump liked NATO, he didn’t let his fellow allies know it. In a May 25 speech in Brussels, Trump refused to commit the US to Article 5, even though the following phrase was originally in his prepared remarks:

“We face many threats, but I stand here before you with a clear message: the US commitment to the NATO alliance and to Article 5 is unwavering.”

Trump took it out, completely blindsiding his top national security aides, like Secretary of Defense James Mattis and National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, who had thought that phrase would remain in the president’s speech.

That’s another reason Trump’s Article 5 statement today is so jarring: He decided to commit to America’s most important alliance in an answer to a question that hadn’t even explicitly asked about it, and wasn’t in his prepared statement.

Trump has been known to surprise his aides by offering contradictory policy statements before, though.

Earlier today, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson asked Middle Eastern countries to quell their diplomatic stand-off with Qatar. But Trump, before his NATO comments, trashed Qatar for its terrorism support — putting him at odds with his top foreign policy aide within the span of a few hours.

So, Trump made a big policy pronouncement, seemingly off the cuff and with no warning. Many are surely happy, relieved, even, while feeling confused at the same time.

Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
Podcasts
Did Trump actually help Venezuela?Did Trump actually help Venezuela?
Podcast
Podcasts

Post-Maduro, some Venezuelans are feeling cautiously optimistic.

By Ariana Aspuru and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
5 ways the Iran standoff could end5 ways the Iran standoff could end
Politics

Is the US on the verge of a deal with Iran or a return to war?

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Ukraine’s fight against Russia is going better than you might thinkUkraine’s fight against Russia is going better than you might think
Politics

The war in Iran looked like a gift for Russia. It hasn’t worked out that way.

By Joshua Keating
The Logoff
Why Trump says the US-Iran war is overWhy Trump says the US-Iran war is over
The Logoff

Trump’s plan to evade an Iran deadline, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters