Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

North Korea’s first move of 2018: sow division between the US and South Korea

Kim had very different things to say to the two countries during his New Year’s Day speech.

AP Images

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un started 2018 much the same way he ended 2017: with harsh threats to use a literal “nuclear button” on his desk to hit the US if war breaks out.

But there was more to Kim’s New Year’s Day speech than his threat to strike anywhere in the US with a nuclear bomb, and it could signal a major change in the Trump administration’s nuclear standoff with North Korea.

That’s because Kim’s speech also called for new talks with South Korea, a diplomatic offer that could make it more difficult for the US president to continue his own military threats against Pyongyang.

Kim offered to send a delegation to the Winter Olympics, set to begin in February in South Korea, and called for official, high-level talks with his neighbor to the South.

“I am willing to send a delegation and take necessary measures, and I believe that the authorities of the North and South can urgently meet to discuss the matter,” Kim said.

North Korea and South Korea haven’t held official talks in two years, and during that time North Korea has made huge advances in its weapons programs.

Like many of Kim’s recent speeches, the new address involved plenty of boasting about his nuclear arsenal and his plan to expand it in the coming year. But that was counterbalanced by Kim’s talk of taking steps to “ease the acute military tensions between the North and the South.”

John Delury, an international relations scholar at Yonsei University in Seoul, told the Washington Post that Kim’s language toward South Korea was “more promising” than expected in its openness to diplomacy.

Those potential talks pose a thorny challenge for the Trump administration, which has taken a hardline approach to dealing with Kim and insisted that he fulfill preconditions that involve curbing his nuclear program before sitting down for negotiations. If these talks between North Korea and South Korea really started to go somewhere, the US could be forced to soften its demands of Kim — or split from its ally.

While making diplomatic overtures to South Korea, Kim also threatened the US with nuclear war

South Korea appears eager to embrace Kim’s overtures. On Tuesday, South Korean Unification Minister Cho Myoung-gyon proposed high-level talks between North Korean and South Korean officials in Panmunjom, a village that sits on the border between the two countries.

If talks between North Korea and South Korea do in fact happen, it would mark the first official conversations between the countries in two years. It would also be South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s first foray into talks with North Korea.

Moon, who took office in May, has pushed hard for dialogue with the North and advocated for policies designed to reduce the chance of conflict with Pyongyang. He recently asked the US to postpone its annual joint military drills with South Korea until after the Olympics. The games are set to start February 9 in Pyeongchang, South Korea — roughly 50 miles from the border with North Korea. South Korea wants to avoid prompting North Korea to do anything provocative, like conduct a ballistic missile test, during the games.

Though Kim assumed a more diplomatic stance toward South Korea in his speech, he saved his harsher language for the US, saying that the country should “know that the whole territory of the US is within the range of our nuclear strike and a nuclear button is always on the desk of my office, and this is just a reality, not a threat.”

The bigger issue at stake is the possibility that Kim is sowing the seeds of division between the US and South Korea.

While Moon has an “anytime, anywhere” stance on talks with Kim, the US has generally pushed for preconditions for talks with North Korea, calling for it to give up its nuclear weapons before talks even start in November. And Trump has also repeatedly undermined Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s attempts to start diplomatic talks, tweeting that he was “wasting his time trying to negotiate with Little Rocket Man,” in October.

“The timing of this overture, combined with [Kim’s] newly declared capability to strike the United States, is shifting the calculus,’’ Robert Litwak, a scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, told the New York Times. “Kim sees a rare chance here to take the side of the South Koreans, against President Trump.”

If South Korea, a vital US ally, gets immersed in substantive talks with North Korea, the Trump administration could to be forced to soften its position or diverge from its ally on North Korea policy.

So far, the Trump administration has indicated that it will not be backing down from its own stance on talks.

“North Korea can talk with anyone they want, but the US is not going to recognize it or acknowledge it until they agree to ban the nuclear weapons that they have,” US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley told reporters in New York on Tuesday.

But administration officials are also saying they’re not concerned about the emergence of a US-South Korea rift. “Kim Jong Un may be trying to drive a wedge of some sort ... I can assure that will not happen,” State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert told reporters on Tuesday.

Trump himself sounds a bit more ambivalent. “Rocket man now wants to talk to South Korea for first time. Perhaps that is good news, perhaps not — we will see!” he tweeted Tuesday.

Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
Podcasts
Did Trump actually help Venezuela?Did Trump actually help Venezuela?
Podcast
Podcasts

Post-Maduro, some Venezuelans are feeling cautiously optimistic.

By Ariana Aspuru and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
5 ways the Iran standoff could end5 ways the Iran standoff could end
Politics

Is the US on the verge of a deal with Iran or a return to war?

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Ukraine’s fight against Russia is going better than you might thinkUkraine’s fight against Russia is going better than you might think
Politics

The war in Iran looked like a gift for Russia. It hasn’t worked out that way.

By Joshua Keating
The Logoff
Why Trump says the US-Iran war is overWhy Trump says the US-Iran war is over
The Logoff

Trump’s plan to evade an Iran deadline, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters