Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Read Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s resignation letter

There’s one particularly intriguing ambiguous paragraph.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, before his resignation, at an October press conference.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions, before his resignation, at an October press conference.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions at an October press conference.
Aaron P. Bernstein/Getty Images
Zack Beauchamp
Zack Beauchamp is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers ideology and challenges to democracy, both at home and abroad. His book on democracy, The Reactionary Spirit, was published 0n July 16. You can purchase it here.

Embattled Attorney General Jeff Sessions resigned on Wednesday afternoon at the president’s request. Effectively, that means he was fired, but the administration didn’t quite want to phrase it that way.

As a result of this arrangement, Sessions penned an official resignation letter, which is common for departing Cabinet members. Much of it focuses on what he sees as his accomplishments in office; to my mind, the most interesting part comes in the second-to-last paragraph.

Related

“Most importantly, in my time as Attorney General we have restored and upheld the rule of law — a glorious tradition that each of us has a responsibility to safeguard,” Sessions writes. “We have operated with integrity and have lawfully and aggressively advanced the policy agenda of this administration.”

This can be read in two ways, which together capture the strange duality of Sessions’s tenure.

On the one hand, Sessions was the most important player in President Trump’s crackdown on immigration — an effort to reduce the number of mostly Hispanic migrants entering the United States, which the president dressed up as protecting the “rule of law.”

On the other hand, Sessions could be referring to his decision to recuse himself from supervising special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign’s potential ties to Russia. This effectively limited the president’s ability to interfere with it, and thus really did contribute to preserving the rule of law.

This recusal appears to be the principal reason Trump wanted so badly to push out Sessions.

Read the entire letter below:

Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
Podcasts
Did Trump actually help Venezuela?Did Trump actually help Venezuela?
Podcast
Podcasts

Post-Maduro, some Venezuelans are feeling cautiously optimistic.

By Ariana Aspuru and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
5 ways the Iran standoff could end5 ways the Iran standoff could end
Politics

Is the US on the verge of a deal with Iran or a return to war?

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Ukraine’s fight against Russia is going better than you might thinkUkraine’s fight against Russia is going better than you might think
Politics

The war in Iran looked like a gift for Russia. It hasn’t worked out that way.

By Joshua Keating
The Logoff
Why Trump says the US-Iran war is overWhy Trump says the US-Iran war is over
The Logoff

Trump’s plan to evade an Iran deadline, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters