Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Want more marriage? Make unions bigger.

A protest organized by two British teachers’ unions on October 17, 2013 in Bristol, England.
A protest organized by two British teachers’ unions on October 17, 2013 in Bristol, England.
A protest organized by two British teachers’ unions on October 17, 2013 in Bristol, England.
Matt Cardy/Getty Images
Dylan Matthews
Dylan Matthews was a senior correspondent and head writer for Vox’s Future Perfect section. He is particularly interested in global health and pandemic prevention, anti-poverty efforts, economic policy and theory, and conflicts about the right way to do philanthropy.

It's pretty well established that unions increase wages for their members, at least in the US. This boost is known as the "union wage premium." Now, it appears there might be a union marriage premium as well.

In the impeccably titled paper, "Marrying Ain't Hard When You Got A Union Card?", in this quarter's issue of the peer-reviewed journal Social Problems, Berkeley's Daniel Schneider and Columbia's Adam Reich attempted to isolate the effect of union membership on marriage rates. They use the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth's 1979 cohort. That survey follows 9,964 people who were 14-22 in 1979 (that is, born in 1957 to 1964). Schneider and Reich track the share of respondents who got married through 2004, so the study looked at the probability that 14 to 22 year olds got married by age 40 to 47.

They find a relationship for men, but not for women: “Approximately 17 percent of men who transition to marriage are covered by collective bargaining agreements as compared to 14 percent of men who do not marry.” They don’t think that union membership on its own causes the increase in marriage rates — by, for example, signaling to prospective partner that one has a steady job with good compensation.

Instead, Schneider and Reich think it’s likelier that union membership makes people, on average, higher-earning, likelier to have health insurance, more stable in jobs, etc., and those changes account for the difference in marriage rates between members and non-members. The relationship between those factors and marriage is much better established.

Bonus finding: contra anti-feminists' arguments that women's increasing incomes are undermining marriage, Schneider and Reich's data suggests that women who work more and have health insurance are likelier to marry.

Thanks to Tyler Cowen for the pointer.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff